Land Rover cliff-edge parking sensor ads banned for being misleading

Two ads for Land Rover Defenders have been banned for giving the misleading impression that the vehicle’s parking sensors could alert drivers to a cliff edge. The TV ads, seen in February, showed several Land Rovers driving in difficult terrain on an island before reverse parking on the edge of a cliff, using the vehicles’ sensors to guide them.

Two viewers, who understood that parking sensors warned of objects behind the vehicle but not empty space, challenged whether the ads were misleading about the extent of the feature’s ability. Jaguar Land Rover agreed that parking sensors would not warn of empty space behind the vehicle.

They believed, however, that the side shots of the vehicle clearly showed that it was reversing towards a boulder, the size and height of which would have been picked up by the sensors. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the ads focused on the Defender’s reversing feature and included a scene with an in-car camera view and the sensor beeping as the vehicle approached the edge of the cliff.

The ASA said: “We was not obvious that the parking sensor was reacting to the rocks rather than the edge of the cliff. considered some viewers would therefore interpret that to mean that the car’s parking sensors could recognize when drivers might be reversing near a drop, which might include a smaller hill edge or a drop before water found in’on-road’ areas, both in urban and more rural settings.

“Because we understood the car’s parking sensors engaged to objects behind the vehicle, rather than to empty space such as a drop, and the rocks were not sufficiently prominent to counter that interpretation, we concluded that the ads misleadingly represented the parking sensor feature.” The ASA ruled that the ads must not appear again, adding: “We told Jaguar Land Rover Ltd to ensure their ads did not mislead about the functionality of their parking sensor feature.”

Jaguar Land Rover said in a statement: “We are very disappointed with the ASA decision to uphold this complaint in the UK as the vehicle, technology and the scene represented is factual, but we will of course abide by their ruling which was based on only two complaints. ”

For more stories from where you live, visit InYourArea


Leave a Comment